You are looking at a static copy of the former PineWiki site, used for class notes by James Aspnes from to Many mathematical formulas are broken, and there are likely to be other bugs as well. These will most likely not be fixed. You may be able to find more up-to-date versions of some of these notes at http:
Multi-objective optimization Adding more than one objective to an optimization problem adds complexity.
For example, to optimize a structural design, one would desire a design that is both light and rigid. When two objectives conflict, a trade-off must be created.
There may be one lightest design, one stiffest design, and an infinite number of designs that are some compromise of weight and rigidity. The set of trade-off designs that cannot be improved upon according to one criterion without hurting another criterion is known as the Pareto set.
The curve created plotting weight against stiffness of the best designs is known as the Pareto frontier.
A design is judged to be "Pareto optimal" equivalently, "Pareto efficient" or in the Pareto set if it is not dominated by any other design: If it is worse than another design in some respects and no better in any respect, then it is dominated and is not Pareto optimal. The choice among "Pareto optimal" solutions to determine the "favorite solution" is delegated to the decision maker.
In other words, defining the problem as multi-objective optimization signals that some information is missing: In some cases, the missing information can be derived by interactive sessions with the decision maker.
Multi-objective optimization problems have been generalized further into vector optimization problems where the partial ordering is no longer given by the Pareto ordering. Multi-modal optimization[ edit ] Optimization problems are often multi-modal; that is, they possess multiple good solutions.
They could all be globally good same cost function value or there could be a mix of globally good and locally good solutions. Obtaining all or at least some of the multiple solutions is the goal of a multi-modal optimizer.
Classical optimization techniques due to their iterative approach do not perform satisfactorily when they are used to obtain multiple solutions, since it is not guaranteed that different solutions will be obtained even with different starting points in multiple runs of the algorithm.
Evolutionary algorithmshowever, are a very popular approach to obtain multiple solutions in a multi-modal optimization task. Classification of critical points and extrema[ edit ] Feasibility problem[ edit ] The satisfiability problemalso called the feasibility problem, is just the problem of finding any feasible solution at all without regard to objective value.
This can be regarded as the special case of mathematical optimization where the objective value is the same for every solution, and thus any solution is optimal. Many optimization algorithms need to start from a feasible point. One way to obtain such a point is to relax the feasibility conditions using a slack variable ; with enough slack, any starting point is feasible.
Then, minimize that slack variable until slack is null or negative. Existence[ edit ] The extreme value theorem of Karl Weierstrass states that a continuous real-valued function on a compact set attains its maximum and minimum value.
More generally, a lower semi-continuous function on a compact set attains its minimum; an upper semi-continuous function on a compact set attains its maximum. Necessary conditions for optimality[ edit ] One of Fermat's theorems states that optima of unconstrained problems are found at stationary pointswhere the first derivative or the gradient of the objective function is zero see first derivative test.
More generally, they may be found at critical pointswhere the first derivative or gradient of the objective function is zero or is undefined, or on the boundary of the choice set.
An equation or set of equations stating that the first derivative s equal s zero at an interior optimum is called a 'first-order condition' or a set of first-order conditions. Optima of equality-constrained problems can be found by the Lagrange multiplier method.A standard maximization problem in n unknowns is a linear programming problem in which we are required to maximize (not minimize) the objective function, subject .
Our solutions are written by Chegg experts so you can be assured of the highest quality! In both of minimization and maximization problems using graphical solutions approaches of Linear Programming, we develop constraint lines in graphs to find a region as a solution for each problem.
The differences between minimization and. Discussion 4. Distinguish between a minimization and maximization LP model. How do you know which of these to use for any given problem?
Distinguish between a minimization and maximization LP model. Minimization and maximization problems by Duane Q. Nykamp is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike License. For permissions beyond the scope of this license, please contact us. E) maximization or minimization of a linear function A When appropriate, the optimal solution to a maximization linear programming problem can be found by graphing the feasible region and.
Four components provide the structure of a linear programming model 1 Objective from MAT at Strayer University. Distinguish between a minimization and maximization LP model.
A Linear programming model requires a single goal or objective. The two general types of objectives are maximization and minimization%(2).