An argument against animal testing in united states as wastage of dollars and animal lives

Sorry, I had something come up in my personal life. Soeren E April 26, at 1: We will need to reduce the scope quite a bit, as a cannot commit to an ambitious essay. A good thesis on my part might be there is a negligible chance of humans creating an artificial general intelligence within the next years.

An argument against animal testing in united states as wastage of dollars and animal lives

Heather Hardy I just found this web page…. Over the last couple of days, I stumbled into a debate about mid-wives vs.

An argument against animal testing in united states as wastage of dollars and animal lives

But my extended family is currently reeling from the death of my year-old cousin from AFE. Plus, I have a niece who coded after delivery and needed immediate care she is a healthy 8-year-old today.

And I can think of several other people I know who had an unexpected emergency arise related to their delivery. Definetly worth the laugh thanks! L You sound uneducated and desperate.

That would quell the quacking. Forsake Are we ever going to evolved a pelvis that outsize these big-headed babies? Todd Duffield The credibility of the information you present on your blog is diminished by the quack ads claiming: Jenflex I find this very interesting.

Obviously you know this field cold, and you do a great job articulating the rational, scientific issues. And I appreciate the way you explain them. If I were giving birth today instead of 16 years ago, I would think differently about a hospital birth than I did at the time.

I am not alone in feeling intimidated, frightened, and depersonalized in a hospital environment. I am a marketer, so my livelihood is rooted in the reality that, however we may aspire to being rational, human beings are emotional, irrational animals.

It seems to me that if hospitals could feel as safe as they are statistically, that might do more than trying to fight emotion with rationality Madtowngirl I know you posted this forever ago, but I just saw it — hospitals do seem to be recognizing this as a problem.

You can labor in a tub. You can have anyone you want in the room with you. I have other problems with that hospital, but I have to give them credit for trying to make it a less depersonalized, less intimidating environment. Michelle Davidson I have to disagree with basically eveyrthing you say here.

You seem to find skewed data. The US IS one of the lowest in 24 hour infant death rates. Babies heads may get bigger, but that has nothing to do with evolution otherwise pelvises should also grow to compensate- survival of the fittest and all that stupid stuffbut the hormones that women are getting in their diets.

Birth is not a search for a problem, it is a natural process- like nursing, or do you also prefer formula so you can monitor what is in it?

However, nature is imperfect and keeps producing women with small pelvises.07 Mark Lynas from Oxford Farming Conference on Vimeo.. I want to start with some apologies. For the record, here and upfront, I apologise for having spent several years ripping up GM crops.

An Ethical Argument Against Animal Experiments. As animal advocates, we oppose animal experiments, on ethical grounds, believing that it is morally wrong to harm one species for the supposed benefit of another.

We encourage others to extend the circle of compassion to include all living creatures – human and nonhuman alike. All that money, nearly a half million dollars worth of racetrack winnings, couldn’t help her as she thrashed in panic and fear.

Related Posts

Flailing beneath the hooves of 30 other terrified horses, last December in a tractor-trailer heading for a Canadian slaughterhouse, once-winning race mare Press Exclusive had lost her balance on the truck, and her place in the world. States of Disgrace; Media; What You Can Do; Ban Puppy Mills Hepatitis drug Fialuridine did not harm dogs and monkeys during animal testing but killed 5 people in human clinical trials.

they simultaneously assert that it is, and can only be, morally justifiable if animals are not like us. Thus the argument for vivisection is predicated.

Animal experimentation is a cruel and outdated practice that wastes money, lives and resources, and sidetracks meaningful scientific progress. The Cruelty and Waste of Animal Experimentation The Issue.

Sustainability, Resource Depletion

National Anti-Vivisection Society. 53 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite Chicago. In the United States alone, humans test vaccines (ALF) and many more are fighting for a ban on animal testing.

A lot of money is needed to house million animals in cages.

An argument against animal testing in united states as wastage of dollars and animal lives

According to Petfinder, " the total cost of caring for a single dog could be over $9, per year." "That means animals will likely be sacrificing their lives to.

Animal Testing - webkandii.com